- The Daily Munch
- Posts
- š The Presidential Debate had 67M viewers
š The Presidential Debate had 67M viewers
PLUS: Goldman Sachs earns $92M āadvisement feeā; Amazonās new affordable private-label brand
Todayās market performance šļø
S&P 500: +0.54% š
Nasdaq 100: +0.47% š
Dow 30: +0.72% š
Russell 2000: +2.49% š
FROM OUR FRIENDS @ VALUE INVESTOR DAILY
Steal our best value stock ideas.
PayPal, Disney, and Nike all dropped 50-80% recently from all-time highs.
Are they undervalued? Can they turn around? Whatās next? You donāt have time to track every stock, but should you be forced to miss all the best opportunities?
Thatās why we scour hundreds of value stock ideas for you. Whenever we find something interesting, we send it straight to your inbox.
Subscribe free to Value Investor Daily with one click so you never miss out on our research again.
TOP STORY
š The Presidential Debate had 67M viewers
šø The Guardian
Earlier this week, many of us eagerly watched the presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
Some thought she was great, others thought he was great, and most believe that weāre screwed either way.
The debate itself, though, was a massive hit, drawing in over 67.14 million viewers.
For context, that's ~31% more than the debate between Trump and President Biden, which had 51.14 million viewers in June.
šø FOX 7
š¬ The past historical average for presidential debates is 59.2 million viewers.
š¬ The two debates between Biden and Trump in 2020 averaged 68.05 million viewers.
Hereās the network breakdown:
ABC News had the largest single network audience with 19.05 million viewers.
NBC followed with 10.08 million, and Fox News had 9.06 million viewers.
The rest:
MSNBC: 6.38 million
CBS: 6.19 million
Fox broadcast network: 4.85 million
CNN: 4.39 million
Telemundo: 1.16 million
Univision: 975,000
Fox Business: 295,000
And that doesnāt even include the additional 7.4 million people who streamed the debate via Hulu, Disney+, and other ABC-owned apps.
Now, pretend Iām saying this in a UFC voice.
Aaaand stillā¦ the undisputed presidential debate champion of the worldā¦
The first debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton in 2016, with 84 MILLION VIEWERS!
šø CNN
FINANCIALS
š¤ Goldman Sachs earns $92M āadvisement feeā
šø FT
Goldman Sachs is set to earn a monstrous $92M fee from its work advising Kellanova, the maker of Pringles and Pop-Tarts, on its $36 billion merger with Mars.
The deal, which closed in August, is the largest U.S. merger this year.
But damn, a $92 million check just for saying 'deal or no deal' seems like a lot.
What an awesome business model, though!
Nah, but actually, how exactly does this kind of "fee" work?
Alright, this will be fun for all the aspiring finance bros and gals.
š¬ Lazard, which advised Kellanovaās board of directors on the deal, is set to earn $10 million.
Basically, when banks like Goldman Sachs advise on big deals, they agree on a fee, but most of that money is only paid if the deal goes through successfully.
Unlike lawyers, who get paid regardless, contracts between companies and investment banks are set up to ensure that the bank works hard to close the deal.
If the deal falls apart, which happens a lot, they donāt get the full amount.
Some recent Goldman fees:
Earned a ~$46 million fee for managing the $65 billion sale of Pioneer last year.
Earned a $80 million from Hess Corp's $60 billion sale to Chevron.
Finally, I understand why everyone wants to be an investment banker; the analysts must get a lot of that money, right?
š¬ Goldman Sachs ($GS) stock is up 23.36% this year.
RETAIL
šŖ Amazonās new affordable private-label brand
šø Amazon
This week, we learned that Amazon is launching a brand-new line of budget-friendly food items.
The label, which is boringly called Amazon Saver, offers most of its items at $5 or less, from cookies and crackers to perishable items like sliced turkey and ham.
š¬ āMore than a hundred additional items will be revealed in the coming months.ā
šø CNBC
Sounds like a steal to me, especially in this economy.
This isnāt the first time Amazon has created a private label; they already have brands like Amazon Fresh, 365, Happy Belly, and Solimo.
But this line is evidently much cheaper because Amazonās ultimate goal is to attract budget shoppers who are switching from name brands to save money.
Duh.
š¬ Shoppers have pulled back spending in the past year as costs have risen 20% to 30% higher than they were three years ago.
It wonāt be easy, though.
Walmart, Aldi, and Target all have their own versions of these long-standing cheap private labels, which people have already come to know and love.
Who here doesnāt love some of Targetās Good & Gather freeze-dried strawberries?
Whackos, thatās who.
But, as we know with Amazon, money is no object, so theyāll be willing to buy their way to the top.
š Amazon ($AMZN) stock is up 24.38% this year.
Want to create a newsletter just like us? šļø
But donāt want to spend hours writing it?
If this is you, and you enjoy how we write the Daily Munch newsletter, reach out to us, and maybe we can do it for you.
Weāre affordable, talented, and committed to creating the best content for you.
The first ten clients get a discount š
Reply